|
Post by Infinite Ego on Jun 6, 2017 10:10:15 GMT -5
ah, that's a cool approach and makes sense
|
|
|
Post by sonicdeviant on Jun 6, 2017 15:10:50 GMT -5
I looked at the sheet again and no, I don't consider it easy.
|
|
mirth
New Member
Posts: 931
|
Post by mirth on Jun 7, 2017 10:01:51 GMT -5
It looks to me that it says something like this ..imagine a blues progression.
1.) A Lydian Dominant |A mixolydian | A minor Pent | Bb melodic minor
2.) D Lydian Dominant |D phrygian dominant| D hw diminished |
3) E whole tone | F Melodic Minor | E mixolydian
Etc.... to me that's all he's writing down. He just doesn't write any chord voicing so he treats them as collective sounds for each and gives options for each "chord".
|
|
|
Post by sonicdeviant on Jun 8, 2017 4:36:53 GMT -5
Yes, your explanation makes sense and I know that's what he has described before. But that's not what's writtten on that paper. All sorts of crazy symbology. Martino does stuff like this too. It's much easier to communicate one's ideas if one uses the already accepted and utilized symbols of other musicians. But that's okay--AH was an alien.
|
|
|
Post by sonicdeviant on Jun 8, 2017 4:39:42 GMT -5
I guess he did write "+4" which I assume he meant as augmented 4th. That's what the jazz world calls it anyway.
|
|
mirth
New Member
Posts: 931
|
Post by mirth on Jun 8, 2017 21:36:44 GMT -5
And the classical world, or diminished 5, or sharp 4 or flat 5....what do you call it?
|
|
mirth
New Member
Posts: 931
|
Post by mirth on Jun 8, 2017 21:37:33 GMT -5
He just made up his own symbols, but from watching his video he basically just uses common scales.
|
|